Calculate X:
Calculate X:
\( 2\log(x+4)=1 \)
\( 2\log(x+1)=\log(2x^2+8x) \)
\( x=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{1}{2}\log_3(x^4)=\log_3(3x^2+5x+1) \)
\( x=\text{?} \)
Find the domain X where the inequality exists
\( 2\log_3x<\log_3(x^2+2x-12) \)
Find the domain of X given the following:
\( \log_{\frac{1}{7}}(x^2+3x)<2\log_{\frac{1}{7}}(3x+1) \)
Calculate X:
To solve the equation , we follow these steps:
Let's work through the steps:
Step 1: Start by dividing both sides of the equation by 2:
Step 2: Translate the logarithmic equation to its exponential form. Recall that implies . Here, the base is 10 (since it's a common logarithm when the base is not specified):
Step 3: Simplify which is the square root of 10:
Step 4: Solve for by isolating it:
Thus, the value of is .
To solve this problem, we'll follow these steps:
Now, let's work through each step:
Step 1: The equation is given by . By applying the power rule, becomes . Hence, the equation becomes:
Step 2: Since the logarithms are equal, we can equate their arguments, provided both sides are defined:
Step 3: Expand and simplify the equation:
So, now the equation becomes:
Rearranging gives:
Which simplifies to:
Or multiplying through by -1:
Step 4: Solve the quadratic equation using the quadratic formula, , with , , and .
Step 5: Verify possible solutions by checking the domain. For , both and are satisfied. For , would be negative, violating the logarithm domain.
Therefore, the solution to the problem is .
To solve the equation , we will first use the power property of logarithms.
Step 1: Apply the power property to the left side: .
Step 2: Now, equating the arguments on both sides, we have: .
Step 3: Rearrange the equation to form a standard quadratic: or .
Step 4: Solve the quadratic using the quadratic formula: , where , , and .
Step 5: Substitute the coefficients into the quadratic formula:
Since we need the solutions to keep the arguments of the logarithms positive, we ensure that 3x^2 + 5x + 1 > 0 for values of from our solution set.
Thus, the solutions satisfying these conditions are given by . Therefore, the correct answer is choice 1: .
Find the domain X where the inequality exists
2\log_3x<\log_3(x^2+2x-12)
Let's solve the inequality .
The expression can be rewritten as using the power property, which states .
Thus, the inequality transforms to:
Since implies when and , the inequality becomes:
Simplifying:
Add 12 to both sides:
Divide both sides by 2:
For both sides of the logarithmic inequality to be defined, we need to ensure:
Solving involves factorization:
This quadratic inequality gives critical points at and . Testing intervals around these points, the inequality holds when or . Considering the logarithmic condition , we narrow it to .
The combined condition from steps 2 and 3 yield:
Therefore, the solution to the inequality is .
6 < x
Find the domain of X given the following:
\log_{\frac{1}{7}}(x^2+3x)<2\log_{\frac{1}{7}}(3x+1)
To solve the inequality , let's proceed step by step:
Therefore, the solution is No solution.
No solution
\( \frac{1}{\log_{2x}6}\times\log_236=\frac{\log_5(x+5)}{\log_52} \)
\( x=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{2\ln4}{\ln5}+\frac{1}{\log_{(x^2+8)}5}=\log_5(7x^2+9x) \)
\( x=\text{?} \)
Find X
\( \frac{1}{\log_{x^4}2}\times x\log_x16+4x^2=7x+2 \)
Solve for X:
\( \log_3(x+2)\cdot\log_29=4 \)
To solve this problem, we'll follow these steps:
Now, let's begin solving the problem:
Step 1:
We use the change of base formula to rewrite :
Then, .
Step 2:
Next, compute . Since 36 can be expressed as , .
Now insert it into the equation:
.
Step 3:
Simplify the left-hand side by canceling :
.
Convert the left side back to log base 2:
.
Simplifying gives:
, which simplifies to:
.
Apply properties of logs, convert both sides to the same numerical base:
.
Let . Therefore:
Equate the arguments: , solving this results in a quadratic equation.
, thus by solving it using the quadratic formula or factoring, we find:
.
Hence, , after solving the quadratic equation, verifying with the given choices, the correct solution is indeed .
To solve the given equation, follow these steps:
We start with the expression:
Use the change-of-base formula to rewrite everything in terms of natural logarithms:
Multiplying the entire equation by to eliminate the denominators:
By properties of logarithms (namely the product and power laws), combine the left side using the addition property:
Since the natural logarithm function is one-to-one, equate the arguments:
Rearrange this into a standard form of a quadratic equation:
Attempt to solve this quadratic equation using the quadratic formula:
Where , , and .
Calculate the discriminant:
The discriminant is positive, suggesting real solutions should exist, however, verification against the domain constraints of logarithms (arguments must be positive) is needed.
After solving , the following is noted:
The polynomial does not yield any values in domains valid for the original logarithmic arguments.
Cross-verify the potential solutions against original conditions:
Solutions obtained do not satisfy these together within the purview of the rational roots and ultimately render no real value for .
Therefore, the solution to the problem is: There is no solution.
No solution
Find X
To solve this problem, we'll follow these steps:
Let's work through these steps in detail:
Step 1: Simplify the logarithmic expressions.
- The expression can be rewritten using the change of base formula: . This comes from recognizing that , hence .
Step 2: Simplify .
- Using the property that , we get .
Step 3: Substitute into the original equation.
Substituting these into the original equation , we get:
.
Step 4: Simplify and solve the equation.
- Knowing that (since ), replace and simplify the equation:
.
Rearrange this to:
.
Step 5: Solve the quadratic equation using the quadratic formula:
The quadratic formula is given by: , where , , .
Substitute these values into the formula:
.
Step 6: Check solution viability.
Since needs to be greater than 1 to make all log values valid, choose (the positive square root).
Therefore, the solution to the problem is , which matches choice 1 in the provided options.
Solve for X: