Look at the following set of numbers and determine if there is any property, if so, what is it?
We have hundreds of course questions with personalized recommendations + Account 100% premium
Look at the following set of numbers and determine if there is any property, if so, what is it?
To solve this problem, we'll follow these steps:
Now, let's work through each step:
Step 1: Checking for arithmetic sequence:
To be an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms should be constant.
For :
The differences are not the same, so it is not an arithmetic sequence.
Step 2: Checking for geometric sequence:
To be a geometric sequence, the ratio of consecutive terms should be constant.
For :
is not 3, similarly is not constant.
Thus, it is not a geometric sequence either.
Step 3: Explore other non-trivial patterns:
Without straightforward arithmetic or geometric patterns identified, try other patterns or sequences, but given the options provided, none of the numerical patterns visibly connect through such standard sequences. This suggests examining deeper provides diminishing returns without knowing additional context or rules that these numbers follow.
Evaluating choices: None of the options directly covers a standard pattern or rule fitting all these points consistently, indicating no obvious, identical property unifies the set.
Therefore, the correct answer is Does not exist, as there isn't an evident mathematical property or pattern connecting these numbers uniformly.
Does not exist
12 ☐ 10 ☐ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Which numbers are missing from the sequence so that the sequence has a term-to-term rule?
After checking arithmetic differences and geometric ratios, if neither shows consistency, the sequence likely has no simple pattern. Not every set of numbers follows a mathematical rule!
A true sequence pattern must work for all consecutive terms. If it only works for 2-3 numbers but breaks down elsewhere, it's not a valid pattern for the entire sequence.
You can explore patterns like , but given the answer choices, focus on basic arithmetic and geometric patterns first. Complex patterns are rarely the answer in introductory problems.
Mathematics teaches us to be honest about our findings. If no clear pattern emerges after systematic checking, the correct mathematical conclusion is that no pattern exists.
While advanced patterns exist, this question tests your ability to systematically check basic patterns and recognize when they don't apply. Trust your systematic analysis!
Get unlimited access to all 18 Series questions, detailed video solutions, and personalized progress tracking.
Unlimited Video Solutions
Step-by-step explanations for every problem
Progress Analytics
Track your mastery across all topics
Ad-Free Learning
Focus on math without distractions
No credit card required • Cancel anytime