Multiplication and Division of Algebraic Fractions - Examples, Exercises and Solutions

Let's examine the given expression:

$\frac{x}{16}$

As we know, the only restriction that applies to a division operation is division by 0, since no number can be divided into 0 parts, therefore, division by 0 is undefined.

Therefore, when we talk about a fraction, where the dividend (the number being divided) is in the numerator, and the divisor (the number we divide by) is in the denominator, the restriction applies only to the denominator, which must be different from 0,

However in the given expression:

$\frac{x}{16}$

the denominator is 16 and:

$16\neq0$

Therefore the fraction is well defined and thus the unknown, which is in the numerator, can take any value,

Meaning - the domain (definition range) of the given expression is:

all x

(This means that we can substitute any number for the unknown x and the expression will remain well defined),

Therefore the correct answer is answer B.

The domain depends on the denominator and we can see that there is no variable in the denominator.

Therefore, the domain is all numbers.

The domain of a fraction depends on the denominator.

Since you cannot divide by zero, the denominator of a fraction cannot equal zero.

Therefore, for the fraction $$$\frac{6}{x}$, the domain is "All numbers except 0," since the denominator cannot equal zero.

In other words, the domain is:

$x\ne0$

Let's examine the given expression:

$\frac{3}{x+2}$

$$As we know, the only restriction that applies to division is division by 0, since no number can be divided into 0 parts. Hence division by 0 is undefined.

Therefore, when we talk about a fraction, where the dividend (the number being divided) is in the numerator, and the divisor (the number we divide by) is in the denominator, the restriction applies only to the denominator, which must be different from 0,

In the given expression:

$\frac{3}{x+2}$

As stated, the restriction applies to the fraction's denominator only,

Therefore, in order for the given expression (the fraction - in this case) to be defined, we require that the expression in its denominator - does not equal zero, meaning we require that:

$$$x+2\neq0$

We will solve this inequality, which is a point inequality of first degree, in the same way we solve a first-degree equation, meaning - we isolate the variable on one side, by moving terms (and dividing both sides of the inequality by its coefficient if needed):

$x+2\neq0 \\ \boxed{x\neq -2}$

Therefore, the domain (definition domain) of the given expression is:

$x\neq -2$

(This means that if we substitute for the variable x any number different from$(-2)$the expression will remain well-defined),

Therefore, the correct answer is answer D.

Note:

In general - solving an inequality of this form, meaning, a non-linear, but point inequality - that uses the $\neq$ sign and not the inequality signs: ,>,\hspace{2pt}<,\hspace{2pt}\geq,\hspace{2pt}\leq,\hspace{2pt} is identical in every aspect to an equation and therefore is solved in the same way and all rules used to solve an equation of any type are identical for it as well.

Let's examine the following expression:

$\frac{8}{-2+x}$

$$As we know, the only restriction that applies to division is division by 0, given that no number can be divided into 0 parts. Hence division by 0 is undefined.

Therefore, when we talk about a fraction, where the dividend (the number being divided) is in the numerator, and the divisor (the number we divide by) is in the denominator, the restriction applies only to the denominator, which must be different from 0,

In the given expression:

$\frac{8}{-2+x}$

As stated, the restriction applies to the fraction's denominator only,

Therefore, in order for the given expression (the fraction - in this case) to be defined, we require that the expression in its denominator - does not equal zero, in other words:

$$$-2+x\neq0$

We will solve this inequality, which is a point inequality of first degree, in the same way we solve a first-degree equation, meaning - we isolate the variable on one side, by moving terms (and dividing both sides of the inequality by its coefficient if needed):

$-2+x\neq0 \\ \boxed{x\neq 2}$

Therefore, the domain (definition domain) of the given expression is:

$x\neq 2$

(This means that if we substitute any number different from $2$ for x, the expression will remain well-defined),

Therefore, the correct answer is answer C.

Note:

In a general form - solving an inequality of this form, meaning, a non-graphical, but point inequality - that uses the $\neq$ sign and not the inequality signs: ,>,\hspace{2pt}<,\hspace{2pt}\geq,\hspace{2pt}\leq,\hspace{2pt} is identical in every way to an equation and therefore is solved in the same way and all rules used to solve an equation of any type are identical for it as well.

Let's examine the given expression:

$\frac{7}{13+x}$

$$As we know, the only restriction that applies to division is division by 0. Given that no number can be divided into 0 parts, division by 0 is undefined.

Therefore, when we talk about a fraction, where the dividend (the number being divided) is in the numerator, and the divisor (the number we divide by) is in the denominator, the restriction applies only to the denominator, which must be different from 0,

In the given expression:

$\frac{7}{13+x}$

As stated, the restriction applies to the fraction's denominator only,

Therefore, in order for the given expression (the fraction - in this case) to be defined, we require that the expression in its denominator - does not equal zero, in other words:

$$$13+x\neq0$

We will solve this inequality, which is a point inequality of first degree, in the same way we solve a first-degree equation, meaning - we isolate the variable on one side, by moving terms (and dividing both sides of the inequality by its coefficient if needed):

$13+x\neq0 \\ \boxed{x\neq -13}$

Therefore, the domain (definition domain) of the given expression is:

$x\neq -13$

(This means that if we substitute any number different from $(-13)$ for the variable x, the expression will remain well-defined),

Therefore, the correct answer is answer D.

Note:

In a general way - solving an inequality of this form, meaning, a non-linear, but point inequality - that uses the $\neq$ sign and not the inequality signs: ,>,\hspace{2pt}<,\hspace{2pt}\geq,\hspace{2pt}\leq,\hspace{2pt} is identical in every way to an equation and therefore is solved in the same way and all rules used to solve an equation of any type are identical for it as well.

Let's consider the fraction and break it down into two multiplication exercises:

$\frac{8}{8}\times\frac{5}{3}$

We simplify:

$1\times\frac{5}{3}=\frac{5}{3}$

Let's consider the fraction and break it down into two multiplication exercises:

$\frac{7}{7}\times\frac{1}{8}$

We simplify:

$1\times\frac{1}{8}=\frac{1}{8}$

Therefore, the described simplification is false.

We will divide the fraction exercise into two multiplication exercises:

$\frac{4}{4}\times\frac{8}{1}=$

We simplify:

$1\times\frac{8}{1}=8$

Therefore, the described simplification is false.

We will divide the fraction exercise into two different multiplication exercises.

As this is a multiplication exercise, you can use the substitution property:

$\frac{7}{7}\times\frac{3}{3}=1\times1=1$

Therefore, the simplification described is false.

We simplify the expression on the left side of the approximate equality:

$\frac{\textcolor{red}{\not{6}}\cdot\textcolor{blue}{\not{3}}}{\textcolor{red}{\not{6}}\cdot\textcolor{blue}{\not{3}}}\stackrel{?}{= }1\\ \downarrow\\ 1\stackrel{!}{= }1$therefore, the described simplification is correct.

Therefore, the correct answer is A.

Using the formula:

$\frac{x}{y}=\frac{z}{w}\xrightarrow{}x\cdot y=z\cdot y$

We first convert the 8 into a fraction, and multiply

$\frac{16ab}{?}=\frac{8}{1}$

$16ab\times1=8a$

$16ab=8a$

We then divide both sides by 8a:

$\frac{16ab}{8a}=\frac{8a}{8a}$

$2b$

After examining the problem, proceed to write the expression on the right side as a fraction (using the fact that dividing a number by 1 does not change its value):

$\frac{16ab}{?}=2b \\ \downarrow\\ \frac{16ab}{?}=\frac{2b}{1}$

Remember the fraction reduction operation,

In order for the fraction on the left side to be deemed reducible, we want all the terms in its denominator to have a common factor. Additionally, we want to reduce the number 16 in order to obtain the number 2. Furthermore we want to reduce the term $a$ from the fraction's denominator given that in the expression on the right side it does not appear. Therefore we will choose the expression:

$8a$

Due to the fact that:

$16=8\cdot 2$

Let's verify that with this choice we indeed obtain the expression on the right side:

$\frac{16ab}{?}=\frac{2b}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \frac{\not{16}\not{a}b}{\textcolor{red}{\not{8}\not{a}}}\stackrel{?}{= }\frac{2b}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \boxed{\frac{2b}{1}\stackrel{!}{= }\frac{2b}{1} }$

Therefore this choice is indeed correct.

In other words - the correct answer is answer B.

Upon examining the problem, proceed to write the expression on the right side as a fraction (using the fact that dividing a number by 1 does not change its value):

$\frac{27ab}{\text{?}}=3ab\\ \downarrow\\ \frac{27ab}{\text{?}}=\frac{3ab}{1}$

Remember the fraction reduction operation,

Note that both in the numerator of the expression on the right side and in the numerator of the expression on the left side the expression $ab$ is present. Therefore in the expression we are looking for there are no variables (since we are not interested in reducing them from the expression in the numerator on the left side),

Next, determine which number was chosen to be in the denominator of the expression on the left side in order that its reduction with the number 27 yields the number 3. The answer to this - the number 9,

Due to the fact that:

$27=9\cdot 3$

Let's verify that this choice indeed gives us the expression on the right side:

$\frac{27ab}{\text{?}}=\frac{3ab}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \frac{\not{27}ab}{\textcolor{red}{\not{9}}}\stackrel{?}{= }\frac{3ab}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \boxed{\frac{3ab}{1}\stackrel{!}{= }\frac{3ab}{1} }$

Therefore this choice is indeed correct.

In other words - the correct answer is answer A.

Upon examining the problem, proceed to write down the expression on the right side as a fraction (using the fact that dividing a number by 1 doesn't change its value):

$\frac{19ab}{?}=a \\ \downarrow\\ \frac{19ab}{?}=\frac{a}{1}$
Remember the fraction reduction operation,

In order for the fraction on the left side to be deemed reducible, we want all the terms in its denominator to have a common factor. Additionally, we want to reduce the number 19 in order to obtain the number 1 as well as reducing the term $b$ from the fraction's numerator given that in the expression on the right side it doesn't appear. Therefore we'll choose the expression:

$19b$

Let's verify that this choice results in the expression on the right side:

$\frac{19ab}{?}=\frac{a}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \frac{\not{19}a\not{b}}{\textcolor{red}{\not{19}\not{b}}}\stackrel{?}{= }\frac{a}{1} \\ \downarrow\\ \boxed{\frac{a}{1}\stackrel{!}{= }\frac{a}{1} }$

Therefore this choice is indeed correct.

In other words - the correct answer is answer D.